The Theft Is Fine, If The Stuff Is Mine! Oj Simpson: Choices And Consequences

“If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” became Johnny Cochran’s mantra as they tried to convince jurors that this case presented by prosecutors is inconsistent and full of holes. This was reported on on September 28th, 1995. Now, some twelve years later, OJ is back in the news with a brand new group of legal problems. This time what’s going to the mantra be: ?The theft is fine when the stuff is mine??

Every choice includes a consequence. OJ is definitely someone else who seems to be having a hard time figuring that out. Of course, his celebrity keeps him inside the news and provide people a chance to see universal laws in the office. Perhaps, it might serve the greater good to think about OJ?s choices and also the consequences that followed.

Whether OJ Simpson is guilty of killing Nichole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman is not a subject of debate. Clearly, a jury has found OJ innocent of capital murder. Yet, OJ made, before and qiuqiu online throughout the trial, himself a target by his behavior. Leading police with a nationally televised police chase didn?t represent a choice that fostered a feeling of innocence. Does it lead him to guilty? No. But, the choice he made had a consequence ? at a minimum the consequence was doubt regarding his innocence. That doubt still exists today.

Now, twelve years later OJ is back on tv having a brush using the law. According to Fox news??On Tuesday, prosecutors charged Simpson with 11 criminal offenses in all of the, such as first-degree kidnapping charge.

Simpson was arrested Sunday following a collector reported a gaggle of armed men charged into his college accommodation at the Palace Station casino and took several items which Simpson claimed belonged to him. He has been held ever since then in protective custody inside a 7-foot-by-14-foot cell.

The Heisman Trophy winner was faced with kidnapping, robbery with use of a deadly weapon, burglary whilst in possession of a deadly weapon, coercion with utilization of a deadly weapon, assault which has a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit kidnapping, conspiracy to commit robbery and conspiracy to commit a crime.?

Once again, every choice features a consequence. If, the truth is, OJ belief that his personal effects were wrongly in somebody else?s possession, would it not be the better choice to alert law enforcement and allow these phones deal while using issue of stolen goods? Knowing that you are a celebrity on tv eye, could you think if you?re OJ that this collection of trying to retrieve you own personal goods is actually a legal problem? Regardless of ownership in the memorabilia, in the event the property ought to be returned you can find choices and methods that might yield a greater consequence.

OJ?s entry and attempt to retrieve ?his memorabilia? demonstrates another poor choice using a disastrous outcome. Charged with 11 criminal offenses, OJ was published on $125,000 domino99 bail. Again as outlined by Fox News, ?The memorabilia removed from the accommodation included football game balls signed by Simpson, Joe Montana lithographs, baseballs autographed by Pete Rose and Duke Snider and framed awards and plaques, together priced at as much as $100,000.

Although Simpson was acquitted of murder charges within the deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and friend Ron Goldman, a jury later held him liable for the killings inside a manslaughter lawsuit and ordered him to pay a $33.5 million judgment. On Tuesday, a California judge gave a legal professional for Goldman’s father per week to supply a listing of items Simpson was accused of taking from the hotel, raising the possibility that they may be sold to pay off the judgment.?

Perhaps OJ will again escape the clutches from the legal system. Although using the counts he could be facing, one might believe that he can offer an up hill battle. Either way, his choices getting him a set of predictable consequences just like mine did 20+ years ago. Having served amount of time in Federal Prison, I understand fully the Law of Reciprocity (You reap everything you sow!). The difference is the fact that I have had the chance to learn in the experience and employ the ability for the higher good. It would appear that OJ has missed the actual.

Every choice includes a consequence. The dynamic thing is, we can select the consequence. It can be incredibly negative (such as what OJ is experiencing at this time), or it can be extremely positive. On a personal level I know the shame and loss that prison brings and the joy of rising in the ashes of my former self to become a VP of Sales and Marketing inside a public company. As humans we can easily make a mistake, we aren’t the MISTAKE.

Perhaps OJ will have, yet once again, the opportunity make the right choices and use his fame and celebrity to the benefit of others. Through the Choices Foundation, a non-profit organization I established, I talk with audiences from coast to coast, having a dynamic ethics message. Especially well accepted by university students, I focus on making clear for them that many choice includes a consequence ? a message essential in today?s environment.

Updated: February 10, 2020 — 5:35 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *